FATF Mutual Evaluation Scorecard
Mexico
Mexico 2018 FATF Mutual Evaluation Report
Key Findings:
- Mexico has a mature and well-developed AML/CFT framework, which has undergone significant improvements since its last evaluation in 2008. However, it still confronts significant risks in ML due to activities associated to organised crime, corruption, drug trafficking, extortion, and tax evasion.
- There is good understanding of ML threats, adequately demonstrated by the financial sector, but generally lacking from designated non-financial business and professions (DNFBPs) and non-profit organisations (NPOs) due to lack of resources. There is a disparity in the recognition of corruption, and an overall shortfall in more complex techniques, such as the misuse of legal persons.
- Financial investigations are low and law enforcement and prosecution are not commensurate to ML/TF risks, as well as asset recovery.
- Identification of beneficial owners (BOs) is limited across the board and DNFBPs do not recognise their role to do so.
Mexico 2022 FATF Follow-Up Report and Technical Compliance Updates
Key Findings:
- Since Mexico’s 2021 Follow-Up Report (FUR) and the culmination of their 2020 National Risk Assessment (NRA), improvements were already evident in the understanding of ML/TF risks coming from DNFBPs and NPOs.
- Amendments were made to legislation since the 2018 Mutual Evaluation Report (MER), driving customer due diligence (CDD) improvements, which required obliged entities to collect certain information to prevent anonymous or fictitious accounts. Additionally, legislation changes led to improving identification of BOs and politically exposed persons (PEP) screening, and also clarified requirements in the collection, retention and transmission of transactional information. These led to re-ratings to Recommendations 8, 10, 12, 15, 16 and 17 in 2021.
- Further improvements have been made, particularly in the case management and timely implementation and follow-up of mutual legal assistance (MLA), which previously impeded investigations, judicial proceedings and confiscations, and led to the re-rating of Recommendation 37 and Recommendation 38.
Other FATF Mutual Evaluation Scorecards
United States
The scorecard tracks the United States 2016 FATF Mutual Evaluation Report and 2024 FATF Follow-Up Report and Technical Compliance Re-Rating Updates.
The Bahamas
The scorecard tracks the Bahamas 2017 FATF Mutual Evaluation Report and 2022 FATF Follow-Up Report and Technical Compliance Updates.
United Arab Emirates
The scorecard tracks the UAE 2020 FATF Mutual Evaluation Report and 2023 FATF Follow-Up Report and Technical Compliance Updates.
Canada
The scorecard tracks the Canada 2016 FATF Mutual Evaluation Report and 2021 FATF Follow-Up Report and Technical Compliance Updates.
415.352.1060 2193 Fillmore Street, Suite 1
San Francisco, CA 94115

RISK | STRATEGY | CYBER COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT
© 2026 Stratis Advisory LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy














